Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | _the_inflator's commentslogin

It is a gimmick, not anything users as a spectrum might find favorable. And the sad thing is, that Apple is the only one with such a laughing stock of UX/UI.

I am totally annoyed by the animations in Apple Notes. The icons have considerable increased in size and everything screams what a mess to me: the shadow as part of "the experience", partly rounded icons which talk more space than rectangles, hidden functions or multi function menus.

There is absolutely no spirit in this update. The animations show no variations, always the same most boring ones (the s curve in Apple Notes).

Lately I found die settings menu in Safari especially disastrous, the tab menu icons when pressed look so ridiculous, I lost words.


I walked through a tech store recently and I saw the new iPhones with the liquid gimmick. I opened the camera app on one of their pro phones and it was lagging. I was shocked, I found it mind-boggling. Brand new phone, up to date OS, marketing material BS and for it to lag just feels unprofessional. I’d understand it if it was a Pinephone or whatever but from Apple? My expectations are reaching lower and lower depths.


I've noticed the same thing- I thought it was just me. a 17 pro's animations felt less smooth than on my 15 pro with ios 18.


Imagine what macOS is on an Intel Mac nowadays without dedicated GPU. Not the latest version either. I'm pretty sure they do it on purpose with their Metal APIs. There is no reason the same computer can become laggy doing the same exact things a few years later because of simple OS updates that adds very little actual functionality.

My mother use an old Mac Mini that is stuck on an updates from eons ago. It is slow as fuck, even though the softwares have barely changed since it was first used. She'll buy a new Mac because that's what she is used to. But I feel like a pretty bad deal considering where Apple is going.

People always rave about how long Apple computers last. I bought my first personal Mac in 2004 and I have to hard disagree. They last only if you buy the most expensive model and even then it still is going to be a miserable experience towards the end. Meanwhile, cheapo Windows PC get 10 years OS support, mostly trouble free. Reality distortion field is massive indeed.


> And the sad thing is, that Apple is the only one with such a laughing stock of UX/UI.

I'm not defending Apple here, but have you seen how people feel about Windows 11?

I don't mind the Liquid Glass UI so much as what's happened to the macOS UX :-/


Don't forget Windows Vista had "Aero"!

> The changes introduced by Windows Aero encompassed many elements of the Windows interface, with the introduction of a new visual style with an emphasis on animation, glass, and translucency; interface guidelines for phrasing and tone of instructions and other text in applications were available.


For those of us who want our mobile devices to just be there when we need it...thank god there are no new animations. I don't need a shot of dopamine every time I open the Mail app. I just want to know that I successfully pressed the icon. Which is what micro interactions (aka small animations) are for. Feedback.

I hope the phone get's even more boring and uninspired next go around. Apple can afford to go back to the 'it just works' motto.


My macOS display system is pushing megapixels and with some good exceptions it feels like many apps have not much more visible information or options than an 80x25 VGA display. This is not to trash VGA displays which were often very well-designed. Some web pages now only show a single paragraph at a time on screen because of cumulative pop-ups, borders, and rounded corners.


> And the sad thing is, that Apple is the only one with such a laughing stock of UX/UI.

Oh, give it time. We thought the same when they went flat, too.


We thought the same thing, and they made pretty significant changes to it based on that pushback. Also the flat redesign didn't have basic problems like white text on an white background all while Apple is saying they spent obscene resources on it.


Just head to https://problogger.com/

I started blogging 20+ years ago - and this was is still the number one go to reference after all.

He started as one of us, and started posting tipps - until... The story continues.


I have more confidence in Meta than the government.

I mean this as expression of technical feasibility and capability to achieve risk reduction with technical measures in an adequate amount of time.

Remember, that for the rest of the non-technical units out there the “digitization” and “IT implementation projects” fail on a massive scale.

Shit in shit out.

Whatever we trash FAANG for, any government has way more blowout.


You trust it more than your government. Which stands to reason at the moment if you are in the US. But there are competent, more trustworthy governments in other parts of the world. And other companies people might trust more than Meta.

Decentralization allows people to choose who they trust. Or rather requires them to really


> You trust it more than your government. Which stands to reason at the moment if you are in the US.

No, it really doesn't, and not because I have any faith in the current US government, just because I've seen the way Meta relates to it.


Jep, just have a look here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45964090

It astounds me, that government still doesn't want to kill say 20k of these invaders.



So Kassel, Germany, may have hope to be less harassed in the future?

FYI, Kassel kinda is the so-called capitol of raccoons. 30k+ raccoons life there, according to estimates.

I certainly would not want to live there. It is crazy how these animals flock together and invade properties. And they aren't shy anymore due to the reverse positive reinforcement they receive by not killing them.

Yes, it is of course in Germany forbidden to kill an invading predatory species - even on your property. This is Germany 2025.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DJXsI_A5DU

https://www.kassel.de/buerger/sicherheit_und_ordnung/tiersch...


Toronto, Canada is hands down the raccoon capital of the world. Something like 100k raccoons live in the city.

I can’t get my head around how such big animals manage to live all around us in such densely populated place. I suppose it helps that they are cartoonishly adorable.

But they are increasingly getting really, really big. It’s just a matter of time before the chonker living in my neighbour’s shed bullies me out of my house.


All you need to know about Toronto is that the generational effort to build a raccoon-resistant trash can has failed every time. They're unstoppable beasts!

Example: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/raccoon-resistant-bin...


I've seen people in Quebec eastern township lock their garbage bins with a padlock. Some "advanced" garbage bins come with integrated lock.


Kassel is under 200k people, with ~100 raccoons/km² though!

Curiously, that raccoon population was established legally and intentionally in the 30s to bolster local fur production; later efforts to eradiacte the animals (for being pests from an agriculture perspective) have been given up.

Damage to local ecosystems seems fortunately pretty limited, even though the raccoons are highly successful and spreading.


> Yes, it is of course in Germany forbidden to kill an invading predatory species - even on your property. This is Germany 2025.

This is blatantly false.

The nandus that are living in the north can and are being killed for exactly this reason: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nandu#Wilde_Population_in_Nord... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greater_rhea#Distribution_and_... for a shorter paragraph in English)

I guess there is a more nuanced reason for not killing the raccoons in Kassel.


The second link parent posted literally explains it, which makes their "oh no, German in 2025 so broken" quite puzzling:

> Es gibt viel zu viele Waschbären, um mit den erlaubten jagdlichen Mitteln im städtischen Umfeld eine nachhaltige Bestandsreduzierung bewirken zu können, denn Waschbären können hohe Verlustraten durch vermehrte Fortpflanzung ausgleichen. Je mehr Waschbären getötet werden, umso mehr Jungtiere kommen nach. Die vielen Jungtiere machen aber unter Umständen mehr Probleme als die Alten, und die Gefahr einer Ausbreitung von Krankheiten und Parasiten wird durch die abwandernden Jungtiere erhöht statt vermindert.

> There are too many raccoons for permitted hunting methods within an urban context to have a sufficient effect on population numbers as raccoons react to high death rates with increased breeding. The more raccoons are killed, the more young are born. The large amount of young raccoons can create more problems than older animals, and the danger of spreading disease and parasites is increased as young animals roam from established territories.

tl;dr: you're not allowed to just randomly shoot shit in urban areas because duh, the population is too large for trapping, and the raccoons are just gonna fuck more and then go a-wandering, making everything worse.


> 30k+ raccoons life there, according to estimates.

Along with 200k+ of the most violent species on the planet: humans.


> Yes, it is of course in Germany forbidden to kill an invading predatory species - even on your property. This is Germany 2025.

Raccoons can and are hunted in Germany, what are you talking about? The federal laws regarding hunting don't mention them and thus allow states to decide. I haven't checked every states local laws and executive orders, but I'm not aware of any that don't allow hunting raccoons.


I can confirm.

My then PageRank 6 Business Website got attacked non stop starting around the 2008.

At this time my log files exploded as well: the Script Kiddies entered the arena.

At the time the first tools leaked into the public to scan for IP ranges and check websites for certain attack vectors.

I miss the era between Compuserve, AOL around 1995 till 2008.

Web Rings, Technorati, fantastic Fan Sites before Wikipedia - wholesome.

Term: Script Kiddies https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Script_kiddie


By 1995 most of the script kiddies I knew were also co-mingling with 0day authors and warez distributors.


I totally agree. He appeared to act against his employer and actively undermined Meta's effort to attract talent by his behavior visible on X.

And I stopped reading him, since he - in my opinion - trashed on autopilot everything 99% did - and these 99% were already beyond the two standard deviation of greatness.

It is even more highly problematic if you have absolutely no results eg products to back your claims.


As one MS Director put it out of frustration: "We do test, a lot. Our testers are called endusers. That's it."

More precisely: He said MSlers get paid by results, achieved Business Value. Testers exist and are called "End Users". Testing is mandatory and part of the core philosophy - they just must do it differently.

Reason: Fear of missing out if moving to slow.

I reminisce the times, where you put in a CD without internet connection. Actual Office is a mess. Thousands of half finished apps, subject to be cancelled anytime. Windows XP's UI was dubbed "glossy" - some of Office's apps UIs are LSD trips for kids. This is ridiculous. Nothing to work with and in no way usable for customer presentations.


> We do test, a lot. Our testers are called endusers.

Maybe they should read bug reports posted by the end users, and not have half-baked solutions posted by Very Ignorant Persons.


That's a good point. I think it would be bearable if they actually had a good feedback platform & interact with their users. Feedback Hub is just terrible: slow, featureless & built on top of their buggiest ui platform.

Unfortunately their audience is probably too big.


There's no business case for reading bug reports.


Crowdsource it. (Microsoft could) start a website called WeHeardYouLetsFixTeams.com where users submit bug reports for Teams out in public, other people vote on how much each bug is a pain point for them, the Teams, er team commits to fixing the top 5 each quarter. Do a whole media circus around it. Do a sales push to get people off Slack/Zulip/Discord/Telegram/Meet/etc. Get some industry accolades for listening to your users.


Only when you are a monopoly


> As one MS Director put it out of frustration: "We do test, a lot. Our testers are called endusers. That's it."

This is true since at least Win 95. One usually needed to wait until SP2 to get a resemblance of quality from Microsoft.

Now, since Vista, they got rid of ServicePacks. This says a lot about their quality culture.


No one gets fired for tuning out of temporary tuning out of his smartphone or doing chores the classic way I guess. ;)

I use mobile services timeboxed and in conjunction with blockers for certain services. I also went back to use old-school pencils and paper for work whenever possible. It is helpful - and fun.

Blocking mobile internet on smartphones improves sustained attention, mental health, and subjective well-being: https://academic.oup.com/pnasnexus/article/4/2/pgaf017/80160...

Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/691462


I think the article is missing two points: if the latest layoffs aren't related to AI, then this doesn't mean AI won't have or has an impact on head count.

And investment and experiments by definition include the risk of failing. In almost everything lies a survivorship bias and no one talks about the 100+ car makers that went into goldrush mode 100+ years ago. This is life. Netflix vs Blockbuster - already forgotten?

Also the "fail rate" - so what part is failing and why? What's with the 5%? If we have a look at exponential functions this might be a really good deal, if the 5% can account for the losses. After all, benefits compound over time.

I witnessed first hand in FAANG some quota hires and I believe that now that no one gets paid for contrived and artificial business advantages, we are back to a more merits based evaluation of workers.

But AI should not be written off as fancy something with no impact. That's the wrong take. Whether it will be a springboard to new jobs that compensate for losses or replacements - I am not yet sure, but tent to be in the former group. ML engineers take care of ML - something new that takes care of something new.

We will see.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: