Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | squigz's commentslogin

Anyone to whom that information is relevant already knew that this vulnerability has existed for a long time.

"Unpleasant" is a fairly good word for describing Calibre's UI (as much as I love Calibre)

It's not terrible, but it's not great. You get used to it very quickly, but it's still clunky.

Oh well. I suspect that sort of update would be a lot of refactoring. Supremely happy with Calibre altogether :)


https://calibre-ebook.com/whats-new

> Allow asking AI questions about any book in your calibre library. Right click the "View" button and choose "Discuss selected book(s) with AI"

> AI: Allow asking AI what book to read next by right clicking on a book and using the "Similar books" menu

> AI: Add a new backend for "LM Studio" which allows running various AI models locally


A good usecase for LLMs with an option to use local models?

Better remove it.


Maybe the issue is this perception that "the Internet" consists mainly of the big 4 social media sites.

Go on Discord. People have usernames, avatars. Discord Profile Bios are just as unique as forum signatures.


I am on Discord and the balkanization+homogeneization is still as prominent there as everywhere else.

Server admins are just NPCs providing @everyone announcements from time to time, to keep the player engaged (spoiler: the average Joe is just irritated by those). Sometimes you get a quest from them.

Also: 99% won't read profile bios (and you have to pay for actual customization, don't you?) while forum signatures were front-and-center.

I have to say I'm surprised to see Discord mentioned as an opposite to social media instead of... just yet another iteration of the same ploy.


> Server admins are just NPCs providing @everyone announcements from time to time, to keep the player engaged. Sometimes you get a quest from them.

Maybe you should join better servers. I'll also add that this was common back in the forum days too. Most admins would just... admin the site.

> Also: 99% won't read profile bios (and you have to pay for actual customization, don't you?) while forum signatures were front-and-center.

Wrong on both counts.

> I have to say I'm surprised to see Discord mentioned as an opposite to social media instead of... just yet another iteration of the same.

I did not present it as an "opposite to social media" - I presented it as a counter to the idea that we've lost the personality GP is talking about


You're one of the 1% who reads profile bios.

Of course, because the alternative - that they're wrong, and more people actually do read bios - couldn't possibly be true.

In any case, I see no reason to believe any higher % of people paid any particular attention to forum signatures back in the day.


Discord also is a centralized piece of proprietary totalitarianism. No thanks.

Fuck discord. Another big for-profit platform that is swallowing big chunks of the internet. before discord there were lots of self-organized forums with their own communities and rules. Now I need to register with some big overlord and download their shitty app just to read what has before been just an URL away?

> before discord there were lots of self-organized forums with their own communities and rules.

And running them was awful and drove the people who did it insane, mostly because you had to fight spambots.


Nah. Right in the browser works great: discord.com/app

You’re going to keep running into a wall thinking of discord like a forum replacement; It’s designed to be an IRC replacement.

The invitation system intentionally creates some privacy so you can build a sense of enclosed community around them, and so you have some control over who sees what. Not having your conversations on full automatic blast to the public is a feature.


IRC works in the browser now thanks to IRCv3. Matrix is another option

The invitation system gives a false sense of privacy. There are bots that crawl publicly posted invites, public IRC channels, etc. Eventually people will understand that IRC and discord are public in the same way we understand usenet to have been public


But you can enjoy it before enshittification arrives!

All praise our VC overlords.


People are desperate for an identity. It has always been that people would latch on to things that seem fitting for them - maybe they put a lot of stock in their identity as a soldier, or as a fan of a band, or maybe as a member of a group like skateboarders. And, interestingly, most of these historic manifestations also have an aspect of "stamp on their forehead advertising their identity" - patches, shirts, other identifying aesthetics from their community.

Are those emails already public?

I feel a weird mix of extreme amusement and anger that there's a fleet of absurdly powerful, power-hungry servers sitting somewhere being used to process this problem for 2.5 minutes

what a world we live in

> When we write and think, we are often thinking in units of advertising

Can you elaborate on what you mean by this?


As meaning more than "having an audience in mind"?

Off the cuff-

"Don't get high on bullshit supply"

"Have a therapist handy when writing (copy)"

"Be kind to therapist, learn from TikTok, chunk your (ad-)ideas"

I'm gonna pay more attention to the idea that the _idea economy_ also runs on envy :)

Emo-integrity is not easy but it's _always_ easier with a society (sorry Buddhists/social liberals!)

Oops! Not enough chunking !!



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: