Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | thevillagechief's commentslogin

The reaction here is interesting. I thought this is what people wanted, a consolidation of all the streaming services into one so you did not have to subscribe to 10 different ones. I personally think it's a bad idea, but people need to figure out exactly what they want.

I don't think many people want one monolith to own all content, what they want is an easy way to watch content from multiple different content owners without having to juggle subscriptions.

music does this far better, there's multiple different platforms that all have the vast majority of music people care about, you can easily opt to rent with streaming or purchase outright and download without DRM. spotify would probably love to have tons of exclusive content, and they're trying this with podcasts etc, but the music industry hasn't been able to enshittify as much as the movie industry, yet.


You're almost making it sound like billionaires are fulfilling the people's wishes instead of their own.

This is one conspiracy theory I've actually considered. Google waited until the Chrome outcome to come out swinging.

I don't want to even think about it. uv has been a revelation!

Oh the things they could have done with Google Now. I want to know the story behind it's death if any insiders are lurking around.

There doesn't need to be "corporatespeak". They don't have to release it right away. They don't have to release it at all.


"Leave the billion dollar corporation alone!"


Corporate Social Responsibility? The assumption is that the work is good for end users. I don't know if that's the case for the maintainers though.


I got excited until I saw they cost $600? Once in a while I'm reminded we exist in very different universes. Still trying to justify splurging on common projects 2 years later.


in my experience as a tech guy who got into fashion and then after several years went back to not caring: Sneakers are the product category with the least differentiation in value-for-money between the high end (especially designer, but also not-designer-but-still-expensive like common projects) both in terms of aesthetics and quality/durability. You're paying $300 more for a 10% better product. Jeans, outerwear, knits, boots, you can more easily justify that cost


As a tech guy who found an interest in design and ancillary fields recently, I am curious to know more. I assume leather, merino wool, cashmere do provide extra value. But other than that I have no knowledge. Eg why would 500 pants be better?


Material and cut/design.

Material is not just about quality, but rarity or uniqueness. For example, japanese denim can get very expensive in part because it's very low volume. For dress pants, it might be a particularly interesting fabric.

A lot of more expensive pants also have interesting designs or proportions that are very unique or hard to find elsewhere. There is a lot of cool stuff you can get for under $500 USD though, that is still pretty expensive.

Some examples around that price range:

- https://stoffa.co/collections/trousers/products/lavender-woo...

- https://www.lemaire.fr/products/twisted-belted-pants-bl760-d...

- https://www.blueowl.us/collections/pure-blue-japan/products/...


I have 2 pairs of pants that cost over $500. Both of them use technical fabrics (Schoeller Dryskin and Stotz EtaProof), have complex patterns (asymmetrical, articulated, etc.), lots of hardware (Riri zippers, magnetic pocket closures, Cobrax snaps), and can be ordered in custom sizing. They also have no text / logos anywhere on the pants. One pair is garment dyed as a complete unit after sewing to give a unique effect that's more interesting and has more "depth" compared to a flat, consistent color.


> Ginni Rometty and Meg Whitman appear to be more interested in keeping their jobs than in saving their companies

I think this is why I have so much respect for Pat Gelsinger. He really was trying to save Intel, so much so that it cost him his job.


It’s rare to find a CEO who is willing to go down with the ship. Most are just posturing for the board and engineering a huge payout if they are forced to leave.


I still remember last year when all the bad news about Intel was coming out and Pat Gelsinger was just tweeting bible verses. He must have been going through it



This was the best thing about Google cache. It's sad they killed it. I really wanted to read this.



I got a heat pump with a backup gas furnace this year. A heat pump just felt like a no-brainer of I was going to get an AC anyway. But gas in PA tends to be cheaper, so the system will use gas at a certain point. The problem is I couldn't have picked a whose installer if I was throwing darts at the wall, but that's another story.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: