Why don't people give Firefox a chance ? Sure google properties don't work on it but that is because google broke them. A simple useragent often fixes it. The point is, people need to start using it or else accept the monopoly of chrome and not complain when they implement user hostile tech.

I get the whole promoted stuff Mozilla has been doing, I just ignore it and carry on. I have unlock origin and pihole to cover for me. Many people use nextdns or whatever and that works great too.

Because Mozilla has proven time and again to be a false friend to the foss community. Look at thunderbird and xul, not to mention the fact that they basically ended up copying chromium..

Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Especially since the alternatives are openly hostile to FOSS.

Brave might not be FOSS-hostile, but they are still a re-badged chromium with some crypto-stuff on top.

They maintain a more optimized adblocker, fingerprinting protection, integrate the ungoogled-chromium patches without breaking the Chrome extension store nor Widevine, and they offer native IPFS integration.

I disable all the crypto integration and use it because it's precisely "chromium without google services but still usable", all while remaining open source and focusing on privacy, something that Edge, Vivaldi and Opera do not.

More like to the side.

Chromium is leading the market by a wide margin in security.

Forking Chromium is the only current viable way forward.

My apologies. I had only Microsoft's and Google's browsers in mind.

"X is not pope/saint-like, so I will stick with Y which is openly a villain"

Unlike Google, who are consistently great? I don't think so.

Unlike Apple’s Safari that consistently introduces privacy related features and provides excellent battery life.

Only to macOS/iOS users.

Edit: Who can afford paying a premium for privacy (if one agrees with the parent assumption, that is).

Or recently, the post-install page having a nagging animated button to please buy Mozilla VPN.

I just use different browsers for different things. Firefox for most things; it's the fastest. Chrome for anything Google related. Edge for PDFs and my Hotmail account.

I used to use Chrome for Google stuff, but recently I found the Multi-Account Containers Firefox extension. Works really well for splitting up a work profile, accounts tied to your real identity, and casual web browsing.

The problem for me is Google Meet falls apart on Firefox when presenting your screen to a group of over 4 people.

Google Docs and Sheets falls apart pretty quickly too.

Then designate Chrome for such tasks and FireFox with containers for anything else. It works great - can confirm.

This is why I made an app to auto switch browsers. There were others but none worked inside browsers wothout extra clicks.

Otherwise it can be a pain to switch often.

why don't you use sumatrapdf?

Edge is really nice for PDFs though and integrates well with printer and web, so what else do I really want?

please give sumatrapdf a try. this is a powerhouse app that is barely talked about. it is like 2-3 Mb in total and does everything pdf.

using edge for pdf is like hair clipping with a chainsaw. just my 2 cents

Sometimes you have to use what you are provided by the company where you work. IT departments can have strict rules any policies what you can run on your computer or not.

In a corporate env you don't choose what browser you can use. And FF has other problems (see other comments)

Ran into the same setting yesterday when I was looking for something else. Sorta annoying; it must be opt-in, not opt-out by default.

Looks like I need to find a new Blink-engine browser for sites that break on Firefox

Try Vivaldi! It is the most feature-complete and pleasant browser I know.

I'd recommend Brave or Vivaldi.

How is this sort of opt-out mechanism not a GDPR violation? I encourage every Edge user to file a complaint with their local data protection authority.