Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm referring to core inflation because it shows upward trend across all prices, which means people without much disposable income will feel the pinch everywhere. High inflation also erodes savings, making it hard to get out of poverty, particularly the generational type.

Unemployment is obviously a problem, but the labor market is super tight right now. There's room to fight inflation without a big dip in employment.



> I'm referring to core inflation because it shows upward trend across all prices

Hmm. I think you're mistaken. "CPI" is across all prices. "Core-CPI" is across most prices (ignores energy and food).

Turns out that poor people use electricity and eat food, at least in America. Upon first glance, it would seem that "CPI" is a better measurement. The issue, as I stated earlier, is that energy/food prices swing wildly in ways completely unrelated to economics. (Look: war in Ukraine... Food prices and Oil prices in peril. Its not "unimportant", its just unpredictable and unrelated to greater economic issues)

We ignore energy/food not because they're "unimportant", but because they're too volatile to draw conclusions from. Even without wars, there's famine, hurricanes, storms, disease, swarms, locusts, etc. etc. which wreck food/energy prices. Even with a perfectly balanced economy in a peaceful world, Mother Nature would still wreck us in an unpredictable fashion.


> We ignore energy/food not because they're "unimportant", but because they're too volatile to draw conclusions from

Yes, that's exactly what I'm referring to. I mean that looking at the core number gives a better picture of the trend.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: