Hah! You're fast. I was about to comment on that: "actual math" probably exists. "actual science" probably doesn't. I'm not sure any experiment can ever be free from error, uncertainty, trade-offs. (And now I'm super curious about this...)
Thanks though. I've narrowed my original comment to more accurately represent the scope I am referring to.
to be fair whether mathematics is a science or not is debated[0], so your initial claim might very well stand true depending on which side one takes in the argument.
That's fair. Though that gets into semantics which I don't find interesting or fun. In this context, I think it's fair to say we're talking about "things that can be experimented on to learn more things."
Thanks though. I've narrowed my original comment to more accurately represent the scope I am referring to.