Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It feels like this is something that should be easily amenable to statistical analysis.

Large numbers of people get diagnosed with lung cancer; smoking rates vary widely and smoking is typically recorded in patient histories; typical radon levels vary widely with geography and are recorded / known. This looks like a near perfect natural experiment, no?



That research was done. The results weren't what regulators expected (wanted?), so we never got to hear them.

https://youtu.be/xhkBLhw-8pk

Caveat: the interviewer strikes me as quite flakey, but his reactions highlight how grounded Dr Cohen was.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: