I am thinking a WiFi camera with a voice activated capture of dangerous driving incidents. A peer review of incidents (phone App) or a police review (I can think of multiple funding models).
Perhaps cameras are somewhat networked to capture multiple cameras when an incident is flagged?
Dangerous incidents should lead to consequences (financial, licensing, insurance etcetera).
My assumption is that that a majority of serious accidents are caused by a few reckless drivers. Remove those reckless drivers from the roads and we can reduce harm.
The difficulty is to design a system that is fair and that isn't abused by authorities (Extremely difficult to avoid - and perception of abuse cannot be avoided). My assumption could easily be wrong: perhaps most accidents are good drivers on a bad day?
I wish tailgaters could be automatically ticketed (easily detected by camera in car going opposite direction on two way roads).
With cameras, we could also start to scientifically detect the right signals to detect people before they cause accidents. Lane wandering? Emergency brakers? People who cut off cyclists?
I know old drivers that would never speed, but who are dangerously poor driving due to other causes.
In New Zealand we have many fatalities every year from tourists who are used to driving on the right, who collide head-on with other innocent drivers because the tourist drives on the wrong side of the road on rural roads. This is detectable and fixable.
I absolutely loath the idea of state surveillance, and there's a slippery slope that starts with "won't you think of the children", but sometimes thinking of the children is the right thing to do. Avoiding misuse and abuse by authorities is hard, but society has the responsibility to design systems to avoid that.
Perhaps cameras are somewhat networked to capture multiple cameras when an incident is flagged?
Dangerous incidents should lead to consequences (financial, licensing, insurance etcetera).
My assumption is that that a majority of serious accidents are caused by a few reckless drivers. Remove those reckless drivers from the roads and we can reduce harm.
The difficulty is to design a system that is fair and that isn't abused by authorities (Extremely difficult to avoid - and perception of abuse cannot be avoided). My assumption could easily be wrong: perhaps most accidents are good drivers on a bad day?
I wish tailgaters could be automatically ticketed (easily detected by camera in car going opposite direction on two way roads).
With cameras, we could also start to scientifically detect the right signals to detect people before they cause accidents. Lane wandering? Emergency brakers? People who cut off cyclists?
I know old drivers that would never speed, but who are dangerously poor driving due to other causes.
In New Zealand we have many fatalities every year from tourists who are used to driving on the right, who collide head-on with other innocent drivers because the tourist drives on the wrong side of the road on rural roads. This is detectable and fixable.
I absolutely loath the idea of state surveillance, and there's a slippery slope that starts with "won't you think of the children", but sometimes thinking of the children is the right thing to do. Avoiding misuse and abuse by authorities is hard, but society has the responsibility to design systems to avoid that.
Here is an article on reckless drivers: https://transalt.org/reports-list/yn29thckywv9n0qpsv4jb1ab07...
I think the article indicates
(1) speeding is correlated with dangerous driving (e.g. running red lights), and
(2) that adding speed limiters won't fix the problem. If hundreds of tickets didn't fix them, limiting speed won't either.
(3) that people love to fix correlations but that we need to fix causations.