If you don't know what intentionality is, a commonplace term in the philosophy of mind, then I suggest you take some time to better acquaint yourself with the subject matter. This is probably the major blow against any kind of AI fantasy, and you don't do yourself any favors by wading in the shallows and confidently holding to misinformed opinions.
So, one last time. A computer program is a set of formal rules that takes one sequence of uninterpreted symbols and produces another sequence of uninterpreted symbols. Adding more rules and more uninterpreted symbols doesn't magically cause those symbols to be interpreted, and it cannot, by definition.
I don't think that "philosophy of mind" contains anything useful for AI development. Most of what I've come across in the field was worthless wordcel drivel, far divorced from reality and any practical applications.
Are you saying that "intentionality", whatever you mean by it, can't be implemented by a computational process? Never-ever? Never-ever-ever?