Do you have enough data to support the opposite conclusion? If not, your call for data is just a pathetic attempt to sound rational while making an empty appeal to authority.
I’m not calling for data. I’m saying the commenter doesn’t have a large enough sample size to draw conclusions—even informal ones.
Just based on the amount of time ChatGPT has been out and the maximum number of different diagnosable and confirmable ailments they could have had in that time.
