Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree with your comment, but a minor nitpick:

> Subscriptions permitted to move as much of the logic as possible out into cloud.

Constant internet connection permitted that. Cloud is only a convenience: you don't have to install and update anything locally, it is updated centrally for everyone by knowledgeable admins instead of some users having problems locally and needing support for each upgrade.

I know this from experience, one company has a local desktop version of our product, but they complain that it requires work from administrator, because users can't upgrade their desktop clients automatically, so they want local-hosted webpage version. This is SCADA system for district heating.

Normal internet users don't want to deal with local-hosted own servers, they want to press a button and it should work. Cloud based systems make that a little more possible.



> Constant internet connection permitted that.

On a technical level yes. But unless you are selling expensive hardware widgets it can be hard to justify constant upkeep cost of servers without a recurring revenue.

That said I too lived through hosting on premises web services that we later pushed to cloud due to the hassle of maintenance. Self hosting is great when you have a dedicated team to keep it running.


So, I would argue that cloud necessitates subscriptions, not that subscriptions allowed everything to be in cloud. It's connected but in other direction.


Fair enough! I agree.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: