Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Insane. Luckily he can use a family member to regain some use of these services or by using a trust company, but still.


That’s sanctions evasion and those companies will be very wary in providing services to any close family of a sanctioned person. My guess is that these people’s SOs, children and their SOs are similarly banned, and that siblings, parents and “close associates” have to provide way more documentation when opening bank accounts than you and I.


Pretty sure the news coverage would have mentioned that if that was the case.


I found the original source (the letter written by the judge) here

https://www.union-syndicale-magistrats.org/sanctions-america...

In it he specifically mentions that family cannot buy stuff for you because that is a crime if they are in the US or are US nationals, and that your direct family is banned from entering the US (p 4). He does not specifically state whether his family are sanctioned or not but he says that is a risk when he talks in general terms on page 7 about the impacts of the sanctions regime for other judges. Perhaps he is simply not married himself.

Either way, for some reason the news coverage didn’t include these parts of the letter, maybe they didn’t read the whole thing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: