Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

correct, my comments are licensed to HN and HN affiliated companies:

>With respect to the content or other materials you upload through the Site or share with other users or recipients (collectively, “User Content”), you represent and warrant that you own all right, title and interest in and to such User Content, including, without limitation, all copyrights and rights of publicity contained therein.

>By uploading any User Content you hereby grant and will grant Y Combinator and its affiliated companies a nonexclusive, worldwide, royalty free, fully paid up, transferable, sublicensable, perpetual, irrevocable license to copy, display, upload, perform, distribute, store, modify and otherwise use your User Content for any Y Combinator-related purpose





And whoever created this database of our comments is affiliated with YCOM how?

Looks like the relationship is not new

https://clickhouse.com/deals/ycombinator


fine, I guess they're associated to HN and so free to plunder... steal... I mean, legally used my content

ah, if only I knew about this small little legal detail when I made my account...


They can update their privacy policy at any time so it wouldn't have mattered if they added it after you made your account.

Functionally, it doesn't matter anyway. These licensing schemes only serve the owners of services large enough to legally badger other moneyed entities into retrospective payments. Individual users have no agency over their submitted content, and nobody in charge of these companies even gives a second thought to keeping it that way. As I've said many times, nobody in this space gives a shit about anything except how they look to investors and potential users-- least of all the people that make the 'content' these machines 'learn'.

Do you have some expectation that when you post your content to some 3P site that you somehow continue to exercise control over it (other than rights under the GDPR)? What basis do you have for this belief?

> What basis do you have for this belief?

The law. And the license agreed when I made the account.


Which law and which terms of the contract?

The terms of contract are easy, it's the stuff here: https://www.ycombinator.com/legal/

The law? I don't know, copyright law I guess?


IAAL but this is not legal advice; seek licensed counsel in your jurisdiction.

Copyright gives you a bundle of rights over your expressive works, but when you give them to someone else for republication, as you are here, you’re licensing them. By licensing according to the terms of service, which is a binding contract, you are relinquishing those rights. As long as there is a term in the terms of service that allows the publisher to convey your expression to a third party, you don’t get any say into what happens next. You gave your consent by submitting your content, and there’s no backsies. (Subject to GDPR and other applicable laws, of course.)

And these days, no web service that accepts user generated content and has a competent lawyer is going to forget to have that sort of term in their ToS.


that's exactly what I'm saying :)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: