Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> who of those same people will stop using ChatGPT to write their work e-mails and assignments for them

Me. I never use AI to write content that I put my name to. I use AI in the same way that I use a search engine. In fact, that is pretty much what AI is -- a search engine on steroids.





Good. I can believe that a few people are principled enough, but principled people tend to be in a minority, regardless of the topic.

I am also a bit afraid of a future where the workload will be adjusted to heavy AI use, to the degree that a human working with his own head won't be able to satisfy the demands.

This happened around the 'car problem' too: how many jobs are in a walkable / bikeable distance now vs. 1925?


I don't think AI is comparable to cars. The problem with cars is that they necessarily use the commons. The more roads you build, the less space you have for trains, parks, housing, etc. AI isn't like that. I can continue to think for myself and look for ways to add value as a human even if everyone around me is using AI. And if that fails, if I can't find a way to compete with AI, if AI really is capable of doing everything that I can do as well as I can do it, why would I not want to use it?

> AI isn't like that.

Tell that to anyone who was hoping to upgrade their RAM or build a new system in the near future.

Tell that to anyone who's seen a noticeable spike in electricity prices.

Tell that to anyone who's seen their company employ layoffs and/or hiring freezes because management is convinced AI can replace a significant portion of their staff.

AI, like any new technology, is going to cost resources and growing pains during its adoption. The important question which we'll only really know years or decades from now is whether it is a net positive.


> how many jobs are in a walkable / bikeable distance now vs. 1925?

Probably the same amount. The only difference is that people are willing to commute farther for a job than someone would've in 1925.


Nope, we have a lot more sprawl. Look at the old maps of cities and compare them to the current ones.

In Ostrava, where I live, worker's colonies were located right next to the factories or mines, within walking distance, precisely to facilitate easy access. It came with a lot of other problems (pollution), but "commute" wasn't really a thing. Even streetcars were fairly expensive, and most people would think twice before paying the fare twice a day.

Nowadays, there are still industrial zones around, but they tend to be located 5-10 km from the residential areas, far too far to walk.

Even leaving industry aside, how many kids you know walk to school, because it is in a walking distance from them?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: